Legislative Assistant
Verified legal answers

Every answer cites the paragraph it stands on.

Ask about the law in your field, in plain language. The answer is written only from the official provisions and checked before you see it.

  • Thousandsindexed provisions
  • + EUjurisdictions
  • ~30 sto a verified answer
  • 90+ %correct answers
The assistant is floating beside the page.
How it works

From your question to a verified answer in four steps.

Four separate tools, each checking the one before. Nothing reaches you that the law itself does not say.

  1. 01 · UNDERSTAND

    Your words become the law’s words

    “Fine for missing records” is rewritten into the exact terms the Act uses.

    ~3 s
  2. 02 · FIND

    Three searches, one official text

    By section number, by wording and by meaning, merged into the provisions that govern.

    ~7 s
  3. 03 · WRITE

    Every sentence points to its §

    The answer is written only from what was found. No source, no sentence.

    ~13 s · streamed
  4. 04 · VERIFY

    A second model checks the first

    Each claim, number and citation is graded against the sources. Fails are rewritten or flagged, never passed off.

    ~4 s
What that gives you
  • Closed over the official textNo internet memory, no guessing. Only the published law.
  • Click any claim, open its §Each sentence links to the provision it rests on.
  • Knows what is in force todayFuture and expired wordings are labelled, never mixed in.
  • Instant on repeat questionsVerified answers are cached per law revision and return in seconds.
Retrieval, not recall

The model never answers from memory.

A general chat model answers from training data. Here the model only ever sees the provisions retrieved for your question, each with its effectivity dates.

  • Exact locators are loaded verbatim
  • Full-text and semantic search are fused and reranked
  • Cross-references are followed, so definitions travel with the rule
Fine for not keeping waste records?
Locators§ 117 · § 14 ods. 1 písm. f)fetched verbatim
Full-textevidenc* · odpad* · pokut*stemmed, ranked
Semanticvector similarity1024-d embeddings
fused · reranked · references followed
What the writer sees24 provisions · 31 k characters
§ 117 ods. 1 § 14 ods. 1 písm. f) vyhl. 366/2015 § 2 Usmernenie MŽP § 103 (upcoming)
Why it is different

Not a chat that remembers the law. One that reads it.

Same question, two kinds of answer.

General AI chatLegislative Assistant
Source Training data Official text, retrieved per question
Citations Often missing or invented Every claim points to a paragraph
Legal state Unknown Anchored to a date you can change
Verification None Independent check of every claim
Dead ends You are on your own Optional hand-off to your expert
Optional · Human in the loop

When the law alone is not enough, a person steps in.

Escalation is a switch in the admin panel. Off, the assistant only ever answers from the legislation. On, anything it cannot verify goes to your expert, and the reply lands back in the same conversation.

  1. 01

    Flagged

    An answer fails verification, finds no provisions, or the reader presses “Ask a human expert”. The case is stored with the question, the draft and the verifier’s objections.

  2. 02

    Reviewed

    Your expert is notified by e-mail and sees the whole case in the admin panel: sources, objections, and the reader’s contact if they left one.

  3. 03

    Returned

    The expert’s reply appears in the reader’s conversation, marked as a human answer, and goes out by e-mail too. Every case stays on record.

Escalation is switched on in this showcase. Switched on per deployment in Settings. No code change needed.
Knowledge bases

One engine, many bodies of law.

One jurisdiction and one area of law each.